Automated Treatment Planning Systems |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vendors and clinicians have employed a variety of approaches in their development of automated treatment plans. Most of the healthcare software developers have integrated treatment planning modules into their client information management systems. The structures are often generic, so they can be used to prepare treatment, education, rehabilitation or other types of individualized service or care plans. Typically, this software is used to establish a hierarchy of problems, goals and objectives. Each patient can have several problems and for each problem there can be multiple goals and related objectives. The better treatment plan programs have the flexibility to adapt to the terminology and conventions used by an organization. The user should have the capability to change the names of the plan, problem, goal and objective fields. For example a treatment plan may be referred to as an individualized client plan (ICP), or individualized service plan (ISP), individualized habilitation plan (IHP) or individualized education plan (IEP). The systems typically have the capability to create as many plans for an individual client as required. Each plan should be hierarchical and relational by design. For example, the highest level of the hierarchy is generally the problem or skill area(s) to receive attention during treatment. The next level of the hierarchy incorporates the long-term treatment goals. There may be one or more goals related to each problem. The third level of the treatment plan is the objective. The short-term objectives may be specific interventions, steps, and processes, issues or actions that need to be taken to accomplish a specific goal. Typically, there are multiple objectives associated with each long-term treatment goal. All of the problem, goals and objective codes should be user-definable. It is also helpful to have a status code associated with each goal and/or objective. This can be used to track how close a client is to achieving his or her objectives and goals. Some systems also allow the therapist to record barriers to completing goals and objectives and strengths or assets. Ideally, the treatment planning function should be integrated with the service notes, client registration, patient abstract, quality assurance, utilization review, scheduling and accounts receivable modules. (Johnson 1996 in Miller). The following bullets summarize some of the service planning features an organization with multiple types and levels of care might expect:
About The Authors: Bruce Johnson, M.S., is President of Johnson Consulting Services, Inc., an information management consulting firm that specializes in working with healthcare, social service and managed care organizations. He can be reached at (800) 988-0934, www.jcsconsultants.com or by e-mail at jcs@eos.net. Mr. Schafer is a clinical records and operations management consultant. He specializes in working with managed care, behvavioral healthcare and child welfare organizations. He can be reached at (800) 661-2435, www.schaferconsulting.com or by e-mail at steve@schaferconsulting.com.
|
||
|
|
||